首页> 外文OA文献 >Retrospective analysis of epiphyte assemblages in relation to seagrass loss in a eutrophic coastal embayment
【2h】

Retrospective analysis of epiphyte assemblages in relation to seagrass loss in a eutrophic coastal embayment

机译:对富营养化沿海隔离带中附生植物组合与海草损失的回顾性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a retrospective study of shifts in species composition of epiphytic macroalgae that occurred during a period of seagrass loss in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. Detailed analysis of data on relative abundances of 108 epiphytic taxa collected over 2 yr from 27 widely dispersed sites around Cockburn Sound showed differences in epiphyte composition between sites with loss of seagrasses (Loss sites) and those with no loss in the the long-term (No Loss sites). Future seagrass losses, however, were not predicted by shifts in species composition. Most species were rare and varied with season of sampling. Hence, varying assemblages of species contributed to differences on each sampling occasion. Only 6 of the 108 species were strong, consistent contributors to differences between Loss and No Loss sites (Sphacelaria sp., Laurencia sp., Enteromorpha intestinalis, E. prolifera, Ulva lactuca, Acrochaetium sp.) and could be considered as ‘indicator species’. Only 2 species (Sphacelaria sp. and Laurencia sp.) were present consistently in high abundances at No Loss sites. Foliose green algae (Ulva sp., Enteromorpha spp.), commonly considered to signal eutrophication, were found consistently in higher abundances at Loss sites. Shifts in epiphyte species composition correlated with patterns of nutrient loading and seagrass decline, in addition to the increases in biomass reported earlier, but did not predict future seagrass loss.
机译:这是一项回顾性研究,研究了西澳大利亚州科克本峡海藻损失期间发生的附生大型藻类物种组成的变化。从库克本峡(Cockburn Sound)周围27个广泛分散的地点收集的超过2年的108个附生生物分类群的相对丰度数据的详细分析显示,在损失海草的地点(损失地点)和长期未损失的地点之间,附生植物成分之间存在差异(没有损失的网站)。但是,未来的海草损失无法通过物种组成的变化来预测。大多数物种都很稀有,并且随着采样季节的变化而变化。因此,物种的不同组合导致每次采样时的差异。在108个物种中,只有6个是造成损失和无损失位点之间差异的强而一致的贡献者(Sphacelaria sp。,Laurencia sp。,肠内Enteromorpha intestinalis,E。prolifera,Ulva lactuca,Acrochaetium sp。),可以被视为“指示物种” '。在No Loss站点上,只有2种(Sphacelaria sp。和Laurencia sp。)始终以高丰度持续存在。人们普遍认为,在损失地点的叶绿藻(Ulva sp。,Enteromorpha spp。)通常认为是富营养化的信号,其丰度较高。除了早先报道的生物量增加外,附生植物种类组成的变化与养分负荷和海草减少的模式有关,但并不能预测未来的海草损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号